Public library

Selected material for first-principles review

The library is intentionally curated: public documents support commercial screening and early engineering review, while raw data, working calculations and project-specific evidence remain controlled.

Overview

Overview

Start here for product-level context, technical orientation and qualification pathways.

News

News and updates

Read public updates on HydroFoamer technology development, partnerships, robotics, IP and deployment.

View News
Guide

HydroFoamer product guide, 2024

Public product guide introducing HydroFoamer's controlled sprayed PU foam support method, use cases and value proposition for early qualification.

Open PDF
Technical note

HydroFoamer technical dive

Public technical introduction for teams moving from concept awareness into engineering, validation and installation questions.

Open PDF
Tool

Open PACE Business Case Tool

Compare conventional and HydroFoamer installation scenarios using explicit assumptions for cost, programme, material movement, logistics and CO2.

Open PACE
Overview

HydroFoamer method overview

A concise explanation of controlled installation, sprayed structural PU foam support, PGMS and as-built evidence.

View resource
Briefing

Request a technical briefing

Start a controlled technical or commercial conversation with project context and evidence needs.

View resource

Technical Evidence

Technical Evidence

Engineering notes and methodologies for assessing materials, load transfer and performance assumptions.

Technology

PGMS & digital installation evidence

Review PGMS, field measurement, robotic application, IP and validation material under Technology.

View resource
Engineering note

PU foam engineering summary

Engineering summary of structural PU foam behavior, support logic and the technical basis for considering HydroFoamer in buried pipeline projects.

Open PDF
Engineering note

Structural encapsulation vs soil optimisation

Comparison of HydroFoamer's structural encapsulation logic with conventional approaches that rely on optimised soil bedding and compaction.

Open PDF
Materials note

PU and PIR usage note

Public note clarifying polyurethane and polyisocyanurate usage considerations for project teams reviewing foam system selection.

Open PDF
Methodology

Thermal and dynamic performance comparison methodology

Methodology note for comparing thermal and dynamic performance between HydroFoamer-supported pipelines and conventional installation assumptions.

Open PDF
Engineering note

Improving PU foam to GRP adhesion

Technical note on resin strategy, adhesion improvement and cost evaluation for PU foam interfaces with GRP pipe systems.

Open PDF
Methodology

Bend and elbow methodology

Engineering methodology for assessing bend and elbow behavior where foam support changes load transfer and restraint assumptions.

Open PDF

Case Studies

Case Studies

Selected project-facing examples that show how the method has been applied or documented.

Drawing

Eikeelva trench section example

Technical-plan excerpt showing a project-specific trench cross-section for HydroFoamer foam support in Norwegian mountain terrain.

View resource
Pilot

Adamselv hydropower project note

Historical one-page note on the 2016 Adamselv / Lille Måsevann full-scale hydropower pipeline application in northern Norway.

Open PDF

Sustainability

Sustainability

Public material on construction activity, concrete replacement and commercial sustainability impact.

Slide

HydroFoamer enterprise value

A partner view showing how controlled pipeline delivery can expand service proposition, addressable market, digital differentiation and enterprise value.

View resource
Sustainability

Construction activity avoided

Understand the sustainability case through material movement, logistics and stated calculation boundaries.

View resource
Position paper

Concrete system replacement note

Public note on replacing concrete-intensive support approaches with sprayed PU foam where project conditions and engineering checks allow.

Open PDF

Hydropower

Hydropower

Hydropower-specific papers, presentations and briefing material for penstock qualification.

Briefing deck

NVE technical briefing, 2026

HydroFoamer briefing deck prepared for NVE discussion on PU foam around composite pipe routes, safety assessment and documentation.

View resource
Academic paper

PU foam penstock paper by Professor Leif Lia

Hydropower-focused paper by Professor Leif Lia on PU foam use around penstocks, published here as selected third-party technical context.

Open PDF

Oil & Gas / Long-distance Pipelines

Oil & Gas / Long-distance Pipelines

Resources for long-distance pipeline risk, protection and consequence-reduction discussions.

Engineering note

Flow-stop catastrophe avoidance in long-distance pipelines

Public engineering note for long-distance pipeline teams reviewing flow-stop risk, consequence reduction and foam-supported protection concepts.

Open PDF

Installation Method

Installation Method

Position papers and notes on trenching, drainage, bends, undergrounding and practical execution.

Checklist

Project qualification checklist

Use the Applications and Business Case pages to frame route, pipe, trench, access, evidence and commercial inputs before a briefing.

View resource
Position paper

Position paper on trenching

Public position paper on trenching implications, excavation scope and installation logic for HydroFoamer-supported pipe routes.

Open PDF
Position paper

Position paper on drainage

Drainage position paper for early review of water management, route conditions and how HydroFoamer changes the installation conversation.

Open PDF
Application note

Cable undergrounding note

Application note outlining where HydroFoamer's controlled support concept may inform underground cable protection and installation discussions.

Open PDF
Flyer

Bend forces flyer

Short technical flyer explaining the practical importance of bend forces and restraint when assessing HydroFoamer-supported pipeline sections.

Open PDF

Academic / Third-party Evidence

Academic / Third-party Evidence

Selected academic, test and third-party validation documents without raw data or editable models.

Academic

ICOLD 2018 - Professor Leif Lia

NTNU presentation to ICOLD 2018 on performance of PU foam as anchoring for penstocks, including construction and monitoring context.

Open PDF
Academic thesis

NTNU master thesis on PU foam anchoring

Selected NTNU master thesis document on PU foam anchoring for penstocks, published without raw appendices or result data.

Open PDF
Test report

Pond test report, part 1

Selected public pond test report for early technical review of foam-supported pipe behavior and validation evidence.

Open PDF
Test report

Pond test report, part 2

Companion pond test report providing additional selected validation context without publishing raw test data.

Open PDF
FEA report

15-degree pipe bend FEA

Selected finite-element analysis report for a 15-degree pipe bend, included as public evidence for bend behavior review.

Open PDF
FEA report

Interim FEM report

Interim finite-element method report selected for public review of structural modeling and technical evidence.

Open PDF
Assessment

DIBt soil test assessment

Third-party assessment document for Baytherm and HydroFoamer soil-test context, selected for public qualification discussions.

Open PDF

News

Updates

Public updates are kept concise. Detailed technical and partner material remains controlled where context or confidentiality requires it.

HydroFoamer at NCC: The Problem Isn't Design. It's Installation.

At this year's NCC conference, HydroFoamer put a blunt message on the table: we do not have a design problem in infrastructure. We have an installation problem.

Read update

PRESS RELEASE: HydroFoamer & Grimbergen announce robotics partnership

HydroFoamer and Grimbergen announced a robotics partnership to support the development of repeatable robotic application for the HydroFoamer installation method.

Read update

HydroFoamer BV and OdelEnergy AS Enter Strategic Partnership to Advance Low-Carbon Penstock Technology in Hydropower Projects

HydroFoamer BV announced a strategic partnership with OdelEnergy AS, a Norwegian hydropower developer, to incorporate HydroFoamer's low-carbon penstock stabilisation technology into upcoming infrastructure projects.

Read update

HydroFoamer BV signs exclusive supply agreement with Odel Energy AS for 110 projects

HydroFoamer Holding BV and Odel Energy AS announced a strategic supply agreement for small-scale hydropower projects in Norway.

Read update

Major breakthrough in PU recycling!

PU foam is difficult to recycle chemically. New research from Denmark points toward more effective recycling routes for polyurethane materials.

Read update

Controlled access

Request the detailed project pack

For detailed design packs, raw test data, calculation workbooks or project-specific evidence, request a technical briefing.

Design packs

Project-specific basis documents, engineering assumptions and release-controlled design evidence.

Raw validation data

Underlying test outputs, result sets and detailed evidence files shared only with the right context.

Calculation models

Editable workbooks, calculators and model assumptions for qualified project or partner reviews.

Partner material

Commercial, operational and deployment evidence prepared for named project teams or partners.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is HydroFoamer a trenchless method?

No. HydroFoamer is a controlled installation method for buried pipelines using sprayed PU foam support.

Does HydroFoamer replace the pipe?

No. HydroFoamer changes the installation system around the pipe. The near-term focus is on composite pipe systems.

Does it work only with composite pipe systems?

The near-term focus is composite pipe systems. Broader applications may require project-specific qualification.

Does it eliminate all imported aggregate?

No. HydroFoamer can significantly reduce dependency on imported bedding and embedment material, depending on project design, trench conditions, pipe system and local requirements.

Is the foam structural?

Yes. The method uses structural polyurethane foam as part of a defined support and restraint geometry.

Is every project suitable?

No. Suitability depends on pipe type, diameter, trench conditions, loads, design requirements, logistics, installation method and regulatory context.

How is the business case calculated?

The business case is calculated using PACE, based on project geometry, logistics, material quantities, production assumptions, cost inputs and CO2 factors.

What makes HydroFoamer different from conventional installation?

Conventional installation often treats imported bedding, embedment, compaction and material handling as unavoidable. HydroFoamer tests that assumption by using engineered sprayed PU foam, measured installation control and auditable as-built evidence to reduce construction activity and improve installation certainty.

Request a technical briefing

Share the route, pipe system, constraints and business-case question. HydroFoamer can help frame the scenario before detailed project work begins.

Request Technical Briefing