HAPI — The HydroFoamer vision
How engineered support creates the foundation for controlled, measurable and automatable pipeline construction.
Watch the HAPI filmResource library
HydroFoamer publishes selected technical papers, case studies and engineering notes to support early project qualification. Detailed design files, raw test data and editable calculation models are shared only in controlled project data rooms.
Public library
The library is intentionally curated: public documents support commercial screening and early engineering review, while raw data, working calculations and project-specific evidence remain controlled.
Films
Two distinct introductions: the wider HAPI vision and the practical HydroFoamer installation method.
How engineered support creates the foundation for controlled, measurable and automatable pipeline construction.
Watch the HAPI filmA practical introduction to the HydroFoamer installation method, engineering principle and project benefits.
Watch the HydroFoamer overviewOverview
Start here for product-level context, technical orientation and qualification pathways.
Read public updates on HydroFoamer technology development, partnerships, robotics, IP and deployment.
View NewsPublic product guide introducing HydroFoamer's controlled sprayed PU foam support method, use cases and value proposition for early qualification.
Open PDFPublic technical introduction for teams moving from concept awareness into engineering, validation and installation questions.
Open PDFCompare conventional and HydroFoamer installation scenarios using explicit assumptions for cost, programme, material movement, logistics and CO2.
Open PACEA concise explanation of controlled installation, sprayed structural PU foam support, PGMS and as-built evidence.
View resourceStart a controlled technical or commercial conversation with project context and evidence needs.
View resourceTechnical Evidence
Engineering notes and methodologies for assessing materials, load transfer and performance assumptions.
Review PGMS, field measurement, robotic application, IP and validation material under Technology.
View resourceEngineering summary of structural PU foam behavior, support logic and the technical basis for considering HydroFoamer in buried pipeline projects.
Open PDFComparison of HydroFoamer's structural encapsulation logic with conventional approaches that rely on optimised soil bedding and compaction.
Open PDFPublic note clarifying polyurethane and polyisocyanurate usage considerations for project teams reviewing foam system selection.
Open PDFMethodology note for comparing thermal and dynamic performance between HydroFoamer-supported pipelines and conventional installation assumptions.
Open PDFTechnical note on resin strategy, adhesion improvement and cost evaluation for PU foam interfaces with GRP pipe systems.
Open PDFEngineering methodology for assessing bend and elbow behavior where foam support changes load transfer and restraint assumptions.
Open PDFCase Studies
Selected project-facing examples that show how the method has been applied or documented.
Technical-plan excerpt showing a project-specific trench cross-section for HydroFoamer foam support in Norwegian mountain terrain.
View resourceHistorical one-page note on the 2016 Adamselv / Lille Måsevann full-scale hydropower pipeline application in northern Norway.
Open PDFSustainability
Public material on construction activity, concrete replacement and commercial sustainability impact.
A partner view showing how controlled pipeline delivery can expand service proposition, addressable market, digital differentiation and enterprise value.
View resourceUnderstand the sustainability case through material movement, logistics and stated calculation boundaries.
View resourcePublic note on replacing concrete-intensive support approaches with sprayed PU foam where project conditions and engineering checks allow.
Open PDFHydropower
Hydropower-specific papers, presentations and briefing material for penstock qualification.
HydroFoamer briefing deck prepared for NVE discussion on PU foam around composite pipe routes, safety assessment and documentation.
View resourceHydropower-focused paper by Professor Leif Lia on PU foam use around penstocks, published here as selected third-party technical context.
Open PDFOil & Gas / Long-distance Pipelines
Resources for long-distance pipeline risk, protection and consequence-reduction discussions.
Public engineering note for long-distance pipeline teams reviewing flow-stop risk, consequence reduction and foam-supported protection concepts.
Open PDFInstallation Method
Position papers and notes on trenching, drainage, bends, undergrounding and practical execution.
Use the Applications and Business Case pages to frame route, pipe, trench, access, evidence and commercial inputs before a briefing.
View resourcePublic position paper on trenching implications, excavation scope and installation logic for HydroFoamer-supported pipe routes.
Open PDFDrainage position paper for early review of water management, route conditions and how HydroFoamer changes the installation conversation.
Open PDFApplication note outlining where HydroFoamer's controlled support concept may inform underground cable protection and installation discussions.
Open PDFShort technical flyer explaining the practical importance of bend forces and restraint when assessing HydroFoamer-supported pipeline sections.
Open PDFAcademic / Third-party Evidence
Selected academic, test and third-party validation documents without raw data or editable models.
NTNU presentation to ICOLD 2018 on performance of PU foam as anchoring for penstocks, including construction and monitoring context.
Open PDFSelected NTNU master thesis document on PU foam anchoring for penstocks, published without raw appendices or result data.
Open PDFSelected public pond test report for early technical review of foam-supported pipe behavior and validation evidence.
Open PDFCompanion pond test report providing additional selected validation context without publishing raw test data.
Open PDFSelected finite-element analysis report for a 15-degree pipe bend, included as public evidence for bend behavior review.
Open PDFInterim finite-element method report selected for public review of structural modeling and technical evidence.
Open PDFThird-party assessment document for Baytherm and HydroFoamer soil-test context, selected for public qualification discussions.
Open PDFNews
Public updates are kept concise. Detailed technical and partner material remains controlled where context or confidentiality requires it.
At this year's NCC conference, HydroFoamer put a blunt message on the table: we do not have a design problem in infrastructure. We have an installation problem.
HydroFoamer and Grimbergen announced a robotics partnership to support the development of repeatable robotic application for the HydroFoamer installation method.
HydroFoamer BV announced a strategic partnership with OdelEnergy AS, a Norwegian hydropower developer, to incorporate HydroFoamer's low-carbon penstock stabilisation technology into upcoming infrastructure projects.
HydroFoamer Holding BV and Odel Energy AS announced a strategic supply agreement for small-scale hydropower projects in Norway.
PU foam is difficult to recycle chemically. New research from Denmark points toward more effective recycling routes for polyurethane materials.
Controlled access
For detailed design packs, raw test data, calculation workbooks or project-specific evidence, request a technical briefing.
Project-specific basis documents, engineering assumptions and release-controlled design evidence.
Underlying test outputs, result sets and detailed evidence files shared only with the right context.
Editable workbooks, calculators and model assumptions for qualified project or partner reviews.
Commercial, operational and deployment evidence prepared for named project teams or partners.
FAQ
No. HydroFoamer is a controlled installation method for buried pipelines using sprayed PU foam support.
No. HydroFoamer changes the installation system around the pipe. The near-term focus is on composite pipe systems.
The near-term focus is composite pipe systems. Broader applications may require project-specific qualification.
No. HydroFoamer can significantly reduce dependency on imported bedding and embedment material, depending on project design, trench conditions, pipe system and local requirements.
Yes. The method uses structural polyurethane foam as part of a defined support and restraint geometry.
No. Suitability depends on pipe type, diameter, trench conditions, loads, design requirements, logistics, installation method and regulatory context.
The business case is calculated using PACE, based on project geometry, logistics, material quantities, production assumptions, cost inputs and CO2 factors.
Conventional installation often treats imported bedding, embedment, compaction and material handling as unavoidable. HydroFoamer tests that assumption by using engineered sprayed PU foam, measured installation control and auditable as-built evidence to reduce construction activity and improve installation certainty.
Share the route, pipe system, constraints and business-case question. HydroFoamer can help frame the scenario before detailed project work begins.